On-Site Evaluations and the Application ProcessBecome familiar with ch. NR 149, the Laboratory Certification and Registration Code. At the time a laboratory signs the application for certification
or registration, it, as an entity, agrees to comply with the ch. NR 149
Code in its entirety and to follow quality control procedures specified
in it. The auditor is only verifying compliance with the NR 149 Code and
the methods of analysis. It is therefore wise to understand the code requirements
and the methods. The auditor may also make some suggestions that fall under
"good laboratory practices" which are helpful.
Preparing for an On-Site EvaluationWhat do you need to do to prepare for an on-site evaluation? Before the Department evaluates your laboratory,
you should review your lab's quality assurance plan and operating procedures for compliance with:
Helpful Hints for a Successful EvaluationReview ch. NR 149, the Laboratory Certification and Registration Code.At the time a laboratory signs the application for certification or registration, it, as an entity, agrees to comply with the ch. NR 149 Wis. Admin. Code in its entirety and to follow quality control procedures specified in it. The auditor is only verifying compliance with the NR 149 Code and the methods of analysis. It is therefore wise to understand the code requirements and the methods. The auditor may also make some suggestions that fall under "good laboratory practices" which are helpful. Provide the auditor with key facility information prior to the visit. The DNR files contain basic information about the laboratory,
but it is always useful to familiarize the auditor in advance with particular
or unusual aspects of the facilities operation. The more the person knows
about the facility, the quicker the evaluation will proceed. Some items
that are commonly requested are:
An auditor may request items not on the above list. If the laboratory is using methods that are different from those listed on the laboratory's application, or its quality assurance manual, it is important to inform the auditor of these changes before the visit so that they can adequately prepare for the evaluation. Organize the laboratory records.A key feature of the Laboratory Certification
Program is its insistence on "documentation". The auditor will need to
see evidence that the laboratory is complying with the various requirements
of the Code. A substantial portion of the auditor's time at the laboratory
will be spent perusing records. Organize the laboratory's records to provide
maximum availability, accessibility, traceability and clarity. Be prepared
to provide the following to the auditor:
This is a list of some items that may be requested. The auditor may request any information or document used to confirm compliance with Wisconsin's requirements. It is a common practice during laboratory evaluations to select several samples at random and "track" them through the laboratory's record system. Conduct this paper audit yourself at your laboratory to detect and correct any possible problems or system flaws before the visit. Organize the laboratory equipment.The auditor will take a tour of the laboratory and check that the instruments, chemicals and equipment needed to perform the tests for which the laboratory is seeking or has certification or registration for are available. Purge the laboratory of unnecessary equipment and chemicals, discard expired stock solutions and make sure that current standards are explicitly labelled and dated. Be realistic about the efforts to improve the laboratory's operation shortly before an audit. The interval between the auditor's contact and actual evaluation can be efficiently used to do a little "house cleaning", but would not be enough time to devise, revise and implement a full quality assurance program. Also, please review any previous on-site inspection reports and make sure that any previously noted deficiencies have been corrected!! The Audit ResponseAny deficiencies identified during the on-site inspection will need to be corrected and must be documented to the Department before the audit can be resolved. Documentation of the corrections should contain how the problem was corrected and actual data proving the implementation of the correction such as photocopies of log book pages, bench sheets, calibration information or raw data. The auditor will inform the laboratory of what is needed in its response to the evaluation report. Since the response is historically the most time consuming process of the evaluation, listen to the auditor and read the report carefully. Submitting a complete and acceptable initial response is the quickest way to become certified or resolve any enforcement action. It is to the laboratory's advantage to submit exactly what the auditor asks for, which is designed to verify compliance. This may sound simple, but most laboratories submit two or more responses before it is complete and acceptable, which more than doubles the time needed to solve the non-compliance issue. The result of multiple submittals is a longer wait for certification or registration, a longer duration for the Notice of Noncompliance or Violation, or a possible escalation in enforcement.
Last Revised: Monday November 17 2008
|